Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 6, 2012 at 8:28 am in reply to: Binding OD master and slave to AD (without breaking OD authentication!) #382702
fatherzimfire
ParticipantAnyone had any experience of doing this?
To simplify the question: Is there anything to look out for with binding an OD master to AD?Many thanks for any responses.
FZ
July 31, 2012 at 9:48 am in reply to: Safely binding OD master to AD (without breaking OD authentication!) #382644fatherzimfire
ParticipantSorry, meant to post this in the AD forum.
Feel free to delete this as I’ll repost there. APologies again.March 15, 2012 at 11:39 am in reply to: Silently upgrade 10.6 clients to 10.7 via ARD/script? #381712fatherzimfire
ParticipantNot sure why my reply was deleted as “spam”, but I’ll try again.
Thanks for the help. The first google search result proved very useful (as did the original reply).
Much appreciated. My initial googling failed to return anything of interest (hence me posting here). I was searching for “silent install” etc.FZ
fatherzimfire
ParticipantIt works if you re-enter your username and password, sure.
I mean true SSO – a webpage authenticating you without you ever having to enter your credentials and saving them in your keychain. Knowing who you are from your kerberos credentials.
As far as I’m aware, this is not possible with IIS.FZ
fatherzimfire
ParticipantEdited –
oops, didn’t see the without ARD bit.FZ
fatherzimfire
Participant10.5, or 10.6. Kerberos ticket obtained and works fine for SSO with shares etc.
I have since learned that IIS does not support Kerberos SSO with Safari, though Apache should work fine if configured properly.FZ
March 19, 2010 at 3:45 pm in reply to: Any hidden “gotchas” with extending the AD scheme for the MCX attributes? #378238fatherzimfire
ParticipantGreat – thanks for all the help.
FZ
December 3, 2009 at 11:12 am in reply to: Permission issues with 10.5 AD clients on win2003 server #377600fatherzimfire
ParticipantI’ve hit exactly the same problem, in a very big way.
Unfortunately the only “solution” I’ve been using is to manually rename thousands of files by hand (on a 10.4 machine), which is what I have been doing.
It appears to be a 10.4 SMB bug (fixed in 10.5). However, SMB in 10.5 (and windows) are unable to understand the old files as they aren’t legal NTFS file names.Feel free to ask any further questions. I’ve become an unwilling “expert” on this irritating bug.
One final thought – Why the hell would you put a bloody space at the end of a filename anyway? Idiotic users are partly to blame in this mess.FZ
June 25, 2009 at 12:21 pm in reply to: LDAP/AD authentication to websites hosted on OSX (Leopard server) #376505fatherzimfire
ParticipantMany thanks for your help, that was the perfect answer.
FZ.
-
AuthorPosts
Recent Comments