AFP548 Changing the world one server at a time.

rhartung

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Commercial Product Experiences #359508
    rhartung
    Participant

    My apologies at my lack of detail.

    We are currently backing up 76 network clients roughly evenly split between Macs and Windows systems, in addition to 5 Windows servers. We need to scale up to 1000+ networked systems, also fairly evenly split between platforms. We recently moved from a 2 drive DLT7000 30 tape autoloader to an old 2 drive LTO-1 24 tape autoloader. We are looking at replacing this with a multi-drive LTO-2 at some point. We are only looking to restore data not system state. Ideally, weekly tape changes with a 1 month archive. We have a gig backbone with 100Mb to desktop in most areas.

    What makes the current solution problematic is that the scripted backups fail on a fairly regular basis. Before switching to the LTO library, the backup sets would get out of sync and require a repair at least once a week. With the DLT library we were maxing out at 45MB/min data transfer throughput. Moving to LTO has improved to 200MB/min on average and also seemingly eliminated the out of sync issue. However, the new problem is that Retrospect loses connectivity with one or both of the drives, requiring a restarted of the server.

    I’m sure there are more questions, but that’s a start to answering some.

    Robert

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)