Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
nakai
ParticipantAt a hearing last month, Apple lawyer Rutger Kleemans claimed Samsung sought the injunction to “hold Apple hostage” because Apple had accused Samsung of copying its iPhone and iPad designs in a separate Dutch case.
“It’s a holdup,” Kleemans said. “Because Apple dared to take action against Samsung’s copycat tactics.”
In April, Apple Inc. sued Samsung in the United States, alleging the product design, user interface and packaging of Samsung’s Galaxy devices “slavishly copy” the iPhone and iPad.
Samsung Electronics Co., based in Suwon, South Korea, fought back with lawsuits of its own, accusing Apple of patent infringement of its wireless telecommunications technology.nakai
ParticipantAt a hearing last month, Apple lawyer Rutger Kleemans claimed Samsung sought the injunction to “hold Apple hostage” because Apple had accused Samsung of copying its iPhone and iPad designs in a separate Dutch case.
“It’s a holdup,” Kleemans said. “Because Apple dared to take action against Samsung’s copycat tactics.”
In April, Apple Inc. sued Samsung in the United States, alleging the product design, user interface and packaging of Samsung’s Galaxy devices “slavishly copy” the iPhone and iPad.
Samsung Electronics Co., based in Suwon, South Korea, fought back with lawsuits of its own, accusing Apple of patent infringement of its wireless telecommunications technology.nakai
ParticipantAt a hearing last month, Apple lawyer Rutger Kleemans claimed Samsung sought the injunction to “hold Apple hostage” because Apple had accused Samsung of copying its iPhone and iPad designs in a separate Dutch case.
“It’s a holdup,” Kleemans said. “Because Apple dared to take action against Samsung’s copycat tactics.”nakai
ParticipantAt a hearing last month, Apple lawyer Rutger Kleemans claimed Samsung sought the injunction to “hold Apple hostage” because Apple had accused Samsung of copying its iPhone and iPad designs in a separate Dutch case.
“It’s a holdup,” Kleemans said. “Because Apple dared to take action against Samsung’s copycat tactics.”
At a hearing last month, Apple lawyer Rutger Kleemans claimed Samsung sought the injunction to “hold Apple hostage” because Apple had accused Samsung of copying its iPhone and iPad designs in a separate Dutch case.
“It’s a holdup,” Kleemans said. “Because Apple dared to take action against Samsung’s copycat tactics.”
In April, Apple Inc. sued Samsung in the United States, alleging the product design, user interface and packaging of Samsung’s Galaxy devices “slavishly copy” the iPhone and iPad.
Samsung Electronics Co., based in Suwon, South Korea, fought back with lawsuits of its own, accusing Apple of patent infringement of its wireless telecommunications technology. -
AuthorPosts