Home › Forums › OS X Server and Client Discussion › Backing Up › BRU or Retrospect
- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by
stevek.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 22, 2008 at 8:17 pm #373475
stevek
ParticipantI have been using Retrospect 6.1 on my xserves, running 10.5.x I have had nothing but issues with it on my intel xserves.
I have had resort to mounting the shares via AFP, and backing them up from there.I have a G5 as my tape server connected to a Tandberg Data Magnum 224 LTO-4 conected via Fiber Channel.
3 G5 xserves running 10.5.x
1 G4 xserve running 10.4.11.x
1 intel xserve 10.5.x
1 g5 tower running xserve 10.5.x
1 intel tower running xserve 10.5.xI was wondering if any one else is using BRU, and if they have had better results with that?
November 4, 2009 at 2:56 pm #377449wemeck
ParticipantSteve–
What kind of issues were you having with restropect?
At one of my school buildings I have seen log in issues and users losing connections or access to their folders.
Also seeing disabled/asleep, but I never installed the No/AFP sleeper.Please let me know.
Than
ks.July 8, 2010 at 4:55 pm #379044skeates
ParticipantI have not looked at BRU, but herd it is not very friendly ( I may be mistaken). I am going through a similar issue at the moment were I need to move away from retrospect 6 because it can’t handle my data efficiently any more.
I was looking at a few products namely PresStore and Amanda. I have tried both PresStore is easy to work with once you play with it for a bit and works like a charm. Amanda I did not have as much luck with. I had issues setting it up so am staring towards PresStore. It has a price tag with it, but well worth it.
Just my two cents.
July 10, 2010 at 10:32 pm #379064wemeck
ParticipantMy problem happened to be related to Retrospect 6 and 10.5.x running on intel servers. We did not see the problem on Retrospect 6 and 10.5.x on PPC servers.
Thanks,
-MJuly 13, 2010 at 4:34 pm #379081jaduke
Participant[QUOTE][u]Quote by: stevek[/u][p]I have been using Retrospect 6.1 on my xserves, running 10.5.x I have had nothing but issues with it on my intel xserves.
I have had resort to mounting the shares via AFP, and backing them up from there.
I was wondering if any one else is using BRU, and if they have had better results with that?
[/p][/QUOTE]
I’ve not looked at BRU for a couple of years, but never could get it really working the way that I wanted.I’m still running Retrospect 6 (G5 xServe, 10.5.8 & Intel xServe 10.4.11 w/Kerio) and not having issues.
I’ve also been running Retrospect 8 and having good luck with it. 8 isn’t perfect, but getting better. The interface is very different than 6, so there’s that learning curve, but once you get the hang of things, it is pretty straightforward. The reason I adopted 8 was that it now supports Disk-to-Disk-to-Tape (or Disk) that 6 never offered. Having those pieces of media off-site is a great peace-of-mind enhancement.
Cheers,
JonJuly 13, 2010 at 4:37 pm #379082stevek
ParticipantI did switch to BRU, the interface SUCKS but once you get past that it is real powerful. It is nice and scriptable and I haven’t had an issue once I set it up.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Comments are closed