Home Forums OS X Server and Client Discussion Open Directory NFS vs AFP for home directories

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #374598
    trondah
    Participant

    Hey guys.

    So, which protocol is the winner for home directories?

    From what other discussions I can find on the subject, NFS seems to be the better one, as it will work with fast user switching.

    Any opinions?

    #374607
    Greg Neagle
    Participant

    The answer, as always, is “it depends”.

    NFS pros:
    Supported by lots of vendors, therefore more choices
    Cross-platform between OS X and Linux/Solaris/etc
    Supports fast user switching
    NFS cons:
    Security model may not fit your environment
    Some filesystem attributes not directly supported

    AFP pros:
    Native Apple solution, so best Apple support
    Filesystem attributes closest match for HFS+
    Easy to set up and run from Apple hardware
    Best support/fit for Portable Home Directories
    AFP cons:
    More limited support for AFP on non-Apple hardware/OS servers
    Not cross-platform
    Doesn’t support fast user switching

    You’ll have to decide which bits are most important for your environment. NFS homes are a good fit for us, but might be a disaster in a K-12 environment…

    -Greg

    #374621
    trondah
    Participant

    Interesting points. Could you elaborate on the NFS security model? I though Kerberos was pretty good?

    Also, which filesystem attributes aren’t supported?

    #374703
    trondah
    Participant

    Yeah Kerberized NFS is just a click away on OD 🙂

    The OSX NFS server doesn’t handle resorce forks?

    And does it matter if they are split into files?

    #376467
    kovacm
    Participant

    Hi,
    can someone tell me how to use NFS instead of AFP for home folders?

    Thank you!

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed